Preexisting lung-restricted autoantibodies (LRAs) are associated with a higher incidence of primary graft dysfunction (PGD), although it remains unclear whether LRAs can drive its pathogenesis. In syngeneic murine left lung transplant recipients, preexisting LRAs worsened graft dysfunction, which was evident by impaired gas exchange, increased pulmonary edema, and activation of damage-associated pathways in lung epithelial cells. LRA-mediated injury was distinct from ischemia-reperfusion injury since deletion of donor nonclassical monocytes and host neutrophils could not prevent graft dysfunction in LRA-pretreated recipients. Whole LRA IgG molecules were necessary for lung injury, which was mediated by the classical and alternative complement pathways and reversed by complement inhibition. However, deletion of Fc receptors in donor macrophages or mannose-binding lectin in recipient mice failed to rescue lung function. LRA-mediated injury was localized to the transplanted lung and dependent on IL-1β–mediated permeabilization of pulmonary vascular endothelium, which allowed extravasation of antibodies. Genetic deletion or pharmacological inhibition of IL-1R in the donor lungs prevented LRA-induced graft injury. In humans, preexisting LRAs were an independent risk factor for severe PGD and could be treated with plasmapheresis and complement blockade. We conclude that preexisting LRAs can compound ischemia-reperfusion injury to worsen PGD for which complement inhibition may be effective.
Wenbin Yang, Emily Jeong Cerier, Félix L. Núñez-Santana, Qiang Wu, Yuanqing Yan, Chitaru Kurihara, Xianpeng Liu, Anjana Yeldandi, Nigar Khurram, Diego Avella-Patino, Haiying Sun, G.R. Scott Budinger, Daniel Kreisel, Thalachallour Mohanakumar, Emilia Lecuona, Ankit Bharat
Usage data is cumulative from May 2023 through May 2024.
Usage | JCI | PMC |
---|---|---|
Text version | 754 | 198 |
222 | 96 | |
Figure | 311 | 4 |
Table | 69 | 0 |
Supplemental data | 92 | 12 |
Citation downloads | 39 | 0 |
Totals | 1,487 | 310 |
Total Views | 1,797 |
Usage information is collected from two different sources: this site (JCI) and Pubmed Central (PMC). JCI information (compiled daily) shows human readership based on methods we employ to screen out robotic usage. PMC information (aggregated monthly) is also similarly screened of robotic usage.
Various methods are used to distinguish robotic usage. For example, Google automatically scans articles to add to its search index and identifies itself as robotic; other services might not clearly identify themselves as robotic, or they are new or unknown as robotic. Because this activity can be misinterpreted as human readership, data may be re-processed periodically to reflect an improved understanding of robotic activity. Because of these factors, readers should consider usage information illustrative but subject to change.